By Dave
Richards
Dave is cofounder
and a board member of Off
The Map. Dave is a Christian and high-tech business
leader. He's been a worship leader, small group leader,
led multiple youth groups and assisted in planting a church
in the 90s. On the business side, Dave has led many high-performance
software teams and marketing efforts. Dave and his wife
Sharon are the proud parents of three children and live
in Seattle.
Bangladesh,
one of the world’s most populous (140 million people)
nations, is the international poster child for poverty
and natural disasters. In fact many leaders have given
up hope that Bangladesh will ever amount to anything more
than a black hole for foreign aid.
Mohammed
Yunus was born in what is now Bangladesh. He came
to the US on a scholarship, earned a Ph.D. in Economics
and then returned to the newly formed country of Bangladesh
to head up a university economics department. While there,
Yunus became increasingly disillusioned with the rampant
poverty and quickly realized that the economics theories
he was espousing were functionally irrelevant.
Do Something
Yunus chose to do something. He visited local
villages and discovered that the poorest people were paying
local moneylenders 10% interest per month (or even per
week!) for working capital to purchase raw materials and
small equipment for their self-employment livelihoods.
This practice of abusive usury consumed their potential
profits and trapped them in an unrelenting cycle of poverty.
Yunus decided to do what he could do. He began offering
tiny (micro) loans to the poorest people with amazing
results. Out of this emerged the Grameen
Bank.
Grameen Bank’s primary focus is providing very small
loans (as little as $25-50) to the poorest of the poor
to be used as working capital in their own micro businesses.
Today the Grameen Bank is the largest bank in Bangladesh
and still focuses exclusively on making loans to the poorest
of the poor.
Challenging The WHBS (Widely Held Belief Systems)
As is the case with all significant change, there have
been innumerable critics and naysayers. Yunus doesn’t
fit nicely into either the conservative or progressive
philosophical camps and he’s had to challenge and overcome
many objections and widely held [mis]beliefs about poor
people. Here are a few of them:
| Widely Held Belief |
Grameen Bank Experience/Results |
| Poor people could not find remunerative
occupations |
Millions of poor borrowers are successfully
self-employed without any training |
| Poor people would not be able to repay
loans |
Repayment rates have reached 97% |
| Poor rural women were not bankable |
96% of borrows are women |
| Poor people cannot save |
Micro-savings have proven as successful
as micro-lending |
| Rural power structures would make sure
that the bank failed |
As of July 2004, there are 3.7 million
borrowers with 1,267 branches in 46,000 villages,
covering more than 68% of the villages in Bangladesh. |
The fundamental reason Yunus has succeeded is that he
believes in the built-in entrepreneurial survival
capabilities of poor people and their commitment to keeping
their word. As a result, Grameen Bank has never required
any collateral
from borrowers.
Widely Held (mis) Beliefs about Ordinary Christians
In a similar way many pastors have Widely Held (mis)Beliefs
about Ordinary Christians. The problem looks
something like this: fewer and fewer people in
their communities are excited about evangelism activities/programs
and participating in evangelism on a regular basis. When
they (pastors) put more energy, attention and money on
big events to re-invigorate people to care more and do
more about evangelism, the resulting returns are weak.
In many ways this is similar to the frustrating situation
the various governmental and non-governmental organizations
(NGOs) found themselves in Bangladesh. It took a new
approach with fundamentally different assumptions to begin
the gradual process of creating an effective, working,
sustainable approach.
Perceptions of Ordinary Christians
Here are some (unhelpful) perceptions I’ve held at times
about Ordinary Christians. See if you can relate.
• Ordinary
Christians don’t tithe without constant “encouragement”
• Ordinary
Christians are looking for religious entertainment experiences
[and complimentary childcare], not the sacrificial service
of true servants
• Ordinary
Christians can’t remember the correct full and life-giving
Christian doctrine, so we have to keep reminding them
• Ordinary
Christians have kind of messy [sinful] lifestyles/habits
which makes it very difficult for them to be “used by
God” as “witnesses”
• Ordinary
Christians are too busy focusing on their jobs, kids,
work, leisure time, non-Christian social groups than being
good servants in their local church
Embracing The Ordinary
My biggest Widely Held (mis)Belief, when it came
to understanding Ordinary Christians, was thinking that
all of these “issues” needed to be overcome rather than
embraced. I also began to understand why Jesus
was so angry with the religious leaders he encountered.
It was simply because they were not making the journey
of faith doable for the ordinary folks around them.
Yunus believes that “religion … should take into account
the reality of people’s lives; moreover, religious leaders
should strive harder to improve people’s lives here on
earth.” [1] He believes
that if financial resources can be made available to the
poor people on terms and conditions that are appropriate
and reasonable, "these millions of small people
with their millions of small pursuits can add up to create
the biggest development wonder." [2]
I am particularly struck by his term “appropriate
and reasonable”. When it comes to providing Ordinary Christians
appropriate and reasonable approaches to evangelism we
have much to learn from Yunus and the Grameen Bank.
Inappropriate Evangelism
The problem with most evangelism programs (like bad lending
approaches) is that they are “inappropriate and unreasonable”
and therefore are not sustainable or scalable. They require
people to stop doing what they normally do and do something
different. We ask people to put their normal lives on
“pause”, do something “unnormal” and then work double-time
to catch up on the things in their lives which have been
queuing up. All of which (to the Ordinary Christian)
feels like the abusive usury I mentioned earlier in this
article. It may even be fun to “act” bold for a while
but eventually we head back to our ordinary lives. It
seems like we leaders are addicted to the dramatic and
allergic to the ordinary.
What about an evangelism approach designed for ordinary,
busy, distracted people? One that didn't require
people to remember much, present/pitch anything, didn't
cost money, and something they could do everyday even
on their worst days? Could this be the key to unlocking
the hidden potential in each ordinary Christian?
If you’re interested in some ideas of what this might
look like, check out Ordinary Attempts. If you
like these ideas, you might be interested in investigating
an upcoming Evangelism
For The Rest of Us event.
=============================================
Interested in learning more about microfinance?
Read: Banker
To The Poor or check out this book
list on microfinance. A recent
study reports that there are now estimated to be some
10,000 organizations involved in some form of microfinance
yet together these organizations are only supplying about
1% of the estimated $300 billion need for micro-loans.
Two (of the many) Christian organizations that are leaders
in microfinance are Opportunity
International (a “pure play” in microfinance) and
WorldVision/VisionFund
(offering microfinance integrated with other development
services.)
[1] Give Us Credit, Alex Counts, Time Books,
1996, page 322.