 |
Off The Map Discussion Board for Christians, Atheists and People In-between (closed to new posts - to participate in ongoing discussion visit our sites otmatheist.com and conversationattheedge.com)
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Stephan
Joined: 24 Mar 2006 Posts: 648 Location: Minneapolis, MN
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 1:28 pm Post subject: Least Trusted Minority |
|
|
There has been discussion here about the fact that Atheists, according to a recent University on Minnesota study, are the least trusted minority in America. I think I may have thought of at least one reason why this is. I am not trying to pass judgment on anyone here, just make an observation.
Atheists are for a great many things – education, conservation, human rights, etc. But when an Atheist becomes an activist they are almost always speaking against something – religion. This is something that most people in our country feel is a pretty good thing, so when the spokespeople for Atheism seem to be unanimously lined up against it, that paints the whole group in a bad light.
I realize that saying Atheists are against religion is not entirely accurate. For the most part they are willing to leave religion alone unless it becomes involved in politics, but the way most people view it, they are against religion in general, and for the most strident ones this is actually true.
Are there any ways that Atheists can change this perception? Can Atheists be activists without appearing to be against religion? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JaysonB
Joined: 24 Mar 2006 Posts: 296 Location: Detroit, MI
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 1:33 pm Post subject: Re: Least Trusted Minority |
|
|
| Stephan wrote: |
Are there any ways that Atheists can change this perception? Can Atheists be activists without appearing to be against religion? |
To be honest?
No.
By the very act of being atheists, we are insulting people's beliefs (in their eyes). People are threatened by our existance.
the only way to change people's perceptions about us is to change their perceptions about the absolute truth of their religions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TXatheist
Joined: 24 Mar 2006 Posts: 1150
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jayson is correct imo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Julie Marie
Joined: 27 Mar 2006 Posts: 867 Location: Mt. Pleasant, SC
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | By the very act of being atheists, we are insulting people's beliefs (in their eyes). People are threatened by our existance.
|
I don't think this is an accurate perception. Christians aren't "threatened" by all people who believe something other than they do. And bringing it down to a personal level, it wasn't your non-belief, or even your belief that the Christian God is a vile entity, that caused my walls to go up in our first encounter, Jayson. I didn't want to interact with such a reservoir of anger.
Regardless of my decision to stop communicating, your "charge" was not something I ignored, and as a result I have been doing a lot of thinking. If your beliefs were threatening to me, I wouldn't have thought about them. I would have continued resting my rump in the 'safety' of biblical inerrancy until the glass in my a$$ caused a hemmorhage.
And I do think there are things atheists can do to change public perception. Without exception, on this board, the atheists have a desire to MTWABP. What about atheist social action groups? For example, atheists for literacy, or atheists aluminum can collection to cover medical care for an indigent person, or atheist for whatever your passion is. Cuz one thing I've learned on these boards, atheists have plenty of passion - and its not all about hating religion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TXatheist
Joined: 24 Mar 2006 Posts: 1150
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| FFRF is a group I support financially and donate to regularly on a national level. I help UU with hands on housing on a local level. My time now is very consumed with my young son but when I get more time, hopefully, I'll go back to getting religion out of the public realm including getting the 10 C monument off the Austin capitol grounds and for Texas to acknowledge a national day of reason to balance out the national day of prayer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Julie Marie
Joined: 27 Mar 2006 Posts: 867 Location: Mt. Pleasant, SC
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | only way to change people's perceptions about us is to change their perceptions about the absolute truth of their religions. |
I don't think that is something you have control over. People will believe what they want to believe. Would it be best if EVERYONE were less absolutely certain about the perfect truth at the basis of their beliefs? Yeah, at least we wouldn't be killing each other over them. But if you say you can't change public perception about atheism unless people change their belief in their religion, you are giving saying you are powerless until someone else makes a move. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Julie Marie
Joined: 27 Mar 2006 Posts: 867 Location: Mt. Pleasant, SC
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | My time now is very consumed with my young son |
I can't think of a better use of your time, TXatheist. There will always be battles to fight and they are important, but our kids have first claim on our time and attention.
As an aside, the debate in Charleston here between the atheist and the christian over God and the constitution got a lot of press, including the article I posted here some time ago regarding the common ground they found. If I hadn't been participating in this conversation already, I'd have been shocked. I'm sure lots of Charlestonians eyes were opened at least a little bit too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TXatheist
Joined: 24 Mar 2006 Posts: 1150
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Julie,
What was the gist of the Charleston issue? I'll tell you why I'm curious. My brother is a xian now because of his wife, for the most part, but her dad is an absolute atheist and talks bad about xianity so I don't know if she does it to be rebellious because she disagrees with me on almost everything and usually has to have the last word, I've learned that is fine as it's not worth arguing but I only met her Dad at the wedding and would love to meet him and discuss the Charleston thing with him, before he goes. [/b] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Julie Marie
Joined: 27 Mar 2006 Posts: 867 Location: Mt. Pleasant, SC
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TX, I tried to find a transcript of the debates, but can't. Herb Silverman, PhD, math professor @ College of Charleston, challenged all comers to a debate on finding God in the consitution. The debate ran over a few weeks, in the paper, and generated a handful of letters to the editor.
Dr. Silverman, I found out, (while trying unsuccessfully to get your info) has fought long and hard for atheist rights down in the lowcountry. (thats coastal SC). He had to fight a legal battle to even have the right to be a notary public.
Of course, that bit of news probably just added another plank to your justifiably angry platform. Sorry about that.
While researching I also found out Dan Barker was here last month speaking. If I'd have known that I'd have gone and listened. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TXatheist
Joined: 24 Mar 2006 Posts: 1150
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It only adds to the ignorance like Texas. The TX Constitution says to hold public office in TX one must acknowledge a supreme being. I'll look up the Silverman stuff now that I have the basics, thanks for looking though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Julie Marie
Joined: 27 Mar 2006 Posts: 867 Location: Mt. Pleasant, SC
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | she disagrees with me on almost everything and usually has to have the last word, |
ain't family grand |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Karen
Joined: 24 Apr 2006 Posts: 847
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Trying to organize atheists is the like proverbial trying to herd cats.
The thing is, we don't have any organizing principles - other than our nonbelief. So, if we're not opposing religion's intrusions on our freedoms, there's no overarching need for us to come together.
That said, there are groups like the FFRF that do try to oppose the takeover of secular society by religion. But because many of us have come from religious backgrounds where we were not allowed to think for ourselves, and we've spent years breaking free from that training, we do tend to be pretty independent-minded types.
Scriptures and religious tradition vilify and denigrate nonbelievers. That's the main reason atheists are misunderstood and mistrusted, IMO. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Julie Marie
Joined: 27 Mar 2006 Posts: 867 Location: Mt. Pleasant, SC
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | hold public office in TX one must acknowledge a supreme being |
where is the ACLU? (now that isn't something I ever thought would come from my keyboard!) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TXatheist
Joined: 24 Mar 2006 Posts: 1150
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Good luck, in Texas the law is absurd. Attorney General Greg Abbott said in the 10C trial to have that monument removed that the 10C are a secular document and should stay because of that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Siamang
Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Posts: 1144
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Julie Marie wrote: | | Quote: | | hold public office in TX one must acknowledge a supreme being |
where is the ACLU? (now that isn't something I ever thought would come from my keyboard!) |
Not in Texas!
You'd have to have a politician get elected and then disavow belief in God in order to have a test case.
Like THAT'LL happen in Texas!
From Wikipedia:
| Quote: | | Six states, however, have language included in their Bill of Rights, Declaration of Rights, or in the body of their constitutions that require state office-holders to have particular religious beliefs. These states are Texas, Massachusetts, Maryland, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee.[1] The required beliefs include belief in a Supreme Being, and belief in a future state of rewards and punishments. Some of these same states specify that the oath of office include the words "so help me God". In some cases these beliefs (or oaths) were historically required also of jurors, witnesses in court, notaries public, and state employees. While these laws are often regarded as relics, if it became known that a non-believer was elected to office, there is the possibility of a court challenge over eligibility. In 1997 the South Carolina Supreme Court ruled that the state constitution requiring an oath to God for employment in the public sector was unconstitutional. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_religious_test_clause
(Second class citizen) Siamang. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|